Archive for October, 2009

Energy Savings for All

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

This was a big week for the idea of residential green building.  Enterprise Community Partners announced the launch of their next generation of the Green Communities Program.  Not only did Enterpise make a $4 billion commitment to create, preserve or retrofit 75,000 green homes and community buildings over the next 5 years, but perhaps more importantly, they issued a national call to action to make all affordable housing green by 2020.  As the founding funder of Green Communities, we were proud to support the next generation of the program with a grant of $1.5 million.

Earlier in the week, Vice President Biden through the Middle Class Task Force announced the Recovery through Retrofit initiative, which aims to create green jobs and allow middle class families to avail themselves of the cost savings of energy efficiency measures.  The goals outlined in the Recovery Through Retrofit Report are nothing short of extraordinary:  set a standard for energy-efficiency of existing homes, establish easy financing options for homeowners and train and certify contractors to ensure they are qualified to do the work properly.  This would mean that homes would have something akin to a sticker - like appliances and cars currently do - to help consumers understand how much energy they will use.  If they want to get their energy costs down, there would be ways to pay for it and to make sure that the people they hire aren’t going to do substandard work, and that they really will get a better performing home.  Through existing technology,  by 2020 we could reduce home energy use by 40% and save $21 billion annually.

Neither of these events got a huge amount of attention, which is a shame.  They were similar in several other ways, as well: each targeted audacious goals, estimated big dollar amounts, and  set 2020 as the deadline.

I hope that in retrospect we will see that it wasn’t coincidence that these initiatives were announced during the same week.   I hope that we’ll look back and see that this week was a turning point when we collectively realized that “green” building is neither exotic, complicated nor a luxury.  In fact, I hope that we are coming around to the idea that we shouldn’t even be talking about “green” building, we should be talking about “good” building.  Why would we build or rehab a building and not put in enough insulation, seal the duct work and caulk the windows to make sure the go-forward energy bills are 20-50% lower?   Why shouldn’t we as consumers insist that the people we hire to work on our most valuable asset are qualified to do the work right?  I hope that we’ll look back and see how stupid we all were to have been building any other way.

In fact, when you think about it like that, it doesn’t seem that this week marked any grand realizations as much as it seems that we are starting to use some common sense.

There’s Money in those Trees!

Monday, October 19th, 2009

As autumn has arrived, and we begin enjoying the beauty of the fall foliage, is seems like an appropriate time to reconsider the value of trees.  I know that there are some who fear storm damage from trees or who dislike the raking chores, but in general, I think it’s safe to say most people like trees.  They add variety to the landscape, provide cool shade to rest and give us a connection to the past and the future.  Trees are nice and good, and some people even write poems about them.

HDF workers working in park Today, though, I want to present some different information about trees - some economic information.  We don’t often think or talk about it, but there are  quantifiable, financial benefits of having trees in our cities, in our parks and in our yards.  These financial benefits are part of the reason the Foundation has committed to fund the planting and restoration of 3 million urban trees over ten years.

First, let’s talk basic value.  A mature tree often appraises for  between $1,000 and $10,000.  On the conservative side, Management Information Services estimates that the 60 million street trees in the U.S. have an average value of $525 per tree.  That means our cities have assets of  about $31 billion in their trees.

For the skeptics among you, let’s talk about what those trees do for the economy.  In terms of real estate, the U.S. Forest Service says that a healthy, mature tree can add an average of 10% to a residential property’s value.  In one study of realtors, 83% believe that trees have a “strong or moderate impact” on the saleability of homes listed for under $150,000 and, for homes over $250,000, that perception increases to 98%.  Additionally, homes with trees sell more quickly that those without.  (Perhaps some realtors should get their shovels out to get some houses moving in this market!)

Now, let’s think about economic development and stability.  People who shop along tree-lined street stay longer and spend more.  In fact, sales in a shaded business district can be 11% higher than similar areas without trees.  That not only helps the store owners, but means more jobs, more sales tax and fewer vacant storefronts.

Now let’s talk about trees as green infrastructure, and by that I mean we should think about trees just like we think about roads, sidewalks and storm sewers.  Speaking of storm sewers, fewer trees mean we need more storm drainage systems.  This is because trees slow and filter rainwater as it falls and as it soaks into the ground.  One million more trees would save cities $3.5 million in annual stormwater runoff costs.  Living in Atlanta where thousands of homes were recently destroyed (most of which were not in a designated flood plain) because the storm drains couldn’t handle the huge amount of rain we got in a very short period of time, I can’t help but wonder if the damage would not have been so bad if we had not lost so many trees and greenspaces to development in recent years.

And what about the air you ask?  We all know that trees clean the air by removing pollutants.   To help visualize the benefits, one acre of trees produces enough oxygen for 18 people to breathe each day and eliminates as much carbon dioxide from the air as is produced from driving a car 26,000 miles.   Another way to put a number on it, is to realize that every forty trees remove 80 pounds of pollutants from the air annually, which means that each 1 million trees saves about $5 million in annual air pollution clean up.  A major study showed that it would cost the City of Chicago $1 million each year to remove the same amount of pollution from the air as its trees currently do and that if you look at the entire metropolitan area, that number jumps to $9.2 million.

So, while I understand that the beauty of a tree and the awe they can inspire in us are priceless, there may be a reason that the color of both money and trees is green.

Not what we do it, but who we do it for

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

Yesterday I got the chance to visit a family who has lived for about a year in a house they helped build with the Atlanta affiliate of Habitat for Humanity.  I always enjoy these opportunities to see the work of the organizations we support, so I was looking forward to the chance to talk to the parents and spend a little time with their 3 children (I’m a sucker for kids).  I didn’t expect, however, to be touched to the extent I was by their story.

Yasir and his doctors after his transplant.

Yasir and his doctors after his transplant.

The family we visited had struggled to afford a healthy, safe home to raise their two girls and infant son until they were selected by Habitat to move into a new home.  Their elation didn’t last long as the day after getting the call from Habitat, they learned that their 6 week old son, Yasir, needed a heart transplant.  His mother was hesitant to have Yasir become the first infant in Georgia to be placed on a “Berlin heart,” a temporary device to help his heart pump, until they explained that without it he would probably die before he could get a transplant.  In December of last year, Yasir got the heart transplant and after many months in the hospital, came home to a wonderful new home.

Yasir’s mother told me what a blessing their home had been as they dealt with the last year.  They are paying far less each month than they paid in rent.  Because the home is built to the green Earthcraft Home standard, their utilities bills are low and the home provides healthy air for Yasir’s weakened immune system.  Knowing all of that would have made anyone feel good about helping families like Yasir’s have a stable, safe place to live for years to come.

Watching Yasir play with his two big sisters in the front yard of their home while knowing what their family had been through during the last year, reinforced the importance of having a “home base.”  Coming home from the hospital each night, his parents didn’t have to worry about whether they were going to be able to make their rent payment or whether they would have to move again and transfer their daughters to another new school.  They didn’t have to worry about where they would bring Yasir when he finally got out of the hospital.  These thoughts just made me remember once more that it’s not about what we do, but the most important thing is who we are doing it for.