The Foundation staff convened a group of experts in green building, sustainability and community development for two days last week to review applications and help select the recipients of our annual Awards of Excellence in Affordable Housing Built Responsibly. (We selected the finalists, are conducting site visits, and the winners will be announced in November at Greenbuild - sorry no previews!) This recognition program was created five years ago to answer the question “Can non-profit organizations build houses that are green while they are affordable?” We knew that the answer was “yes,” and we wanted to showcase examples of organizations not only doing it, but doing it exceptionally well. We believed this would inspire others to strive to complete similar projects.
I was struck during the discussion how the world has changed during these five years - and how much it hasn’t. In 2004, we were scrutinizing data about the type of lightbulbs and windows selected, the efficiency of the faucets and whether low-VOC paint was used, even though it was more expensive and difficult to find. Last week, we were comparing projects that have achieved platinum LEED certification (if you aren’t familiar, take that as shorthand for a very green, very efficient building), considering how accessible transportation is to the residents, and debating whether the density of the buildings had too great of an impact on the natural surroundings. This was essentially because today only CFLs are used; typical low-flow fixtures reduce water consumption by 30%; and no-VOC paint costs the same as the smelly stuff.
And while I was struck by how our discussion of the projects had evolved to take certain basic sustainable building items as givens and moved on to consider broader community issues as well, I also realized how competitive the 2004 winners would have been in the discussion to select 2009’s recipients. (See case studies of all of our awards of excellence recipients.) In fact, this was a reminder of how far ahead mission-based organizations have been when thinking about the practical, pocketbook and health issues of green homes. Early on, they saw the importance of bringing the benefits of green building to the families they helped and who are now paying less for their utilities every month, having fewer asthma attacks and enjoying the other economic and social benefits stable housing brings.
This also made me think about who was catching up with whom. While the Foundation was only thinking about the four walls of the building and from the lot line in, the nonprofit builders were certainly thinking more broadly about the community-wide issues. They were considering whether their residents would be able to travel easily to jobs, stores and services, whether they were providing assets for the community at large, such as green areas and community centers, and whether they were hiring and training people from the neighborhood. So while I think back over the organizations we have recognized, I want to add an additional note of thanks for the education they have provided us along the way.












Follow me on Twitter
As I think about our work over the last 20 years, we have evolved from looking at elements of a building to the building as a set of connected systems, to the ecosystem of a city as integrated and multi-faceted as our natural systems. We have now started to see that no matter how good the individual building is, the most important thing we can do is address the life support, social and natural infrastructure that our buildings are connected to.
I think we are now seeing that the leaders of yesterday because of mission focus are evolving their learning to a systems focus versus individual buildings. The reason they can move to this level is the critical thinking and systems integration approach to buildings is the same when you get to the overall health of our urban environment and health of our neighborhoods and families that make our cities the vibrant places they are.
Many thanks to Kelly and the Foundation for running this program. As a first-time participant on the awards panel, it was uplifting to see the breadth and quality of the applications. Each project story is unique, but they add up to show that there are a lot of creative solutions and partnerships being pieced together across the country. They all share the goal of creating housing that’s affordable, attractive, and “green” — a critical issue in the context of creating truly sustainable communities. The awards program brings great visibility to success stories that are nothing short of inspiring. Thanks again!
_________________
Ken Rosenfeld
Director, Sustainability Program
Center for Research and Innovation
National League of Cities
Ken - Many thanks for your thoughtful and enthusiastic participation on the Awards Committee! We look forward to sharing the best practices from the Award recipients with all of the members of the National League of Cities.